<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Vinny Lingham's Blog - Latest Comments in Poll: User Data Aggregation &amp;#038; Distribution</title><link>http://vinnylingham.disqus.com/</link><description>Personal Blog of Vinny Lingham, CEO of SynthaSite</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:39:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Poll: User Data Aggregation &amp;#038; Distribution</title><link>http://www.vinnylingham.com/user-data-aggregation-distribution-portability.html#comment-1611446</link><description>We agree a bit with the commenter above.  The aggregators don't quite do it.  It seems you don't get the same effect.  They may aggregate certain things but certainly not their social networking we think...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blog Marketing Journal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:39:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: User Data Aggregation &amp;#038; Distribution</title><link>http://www.vinnylingham.com/user-data-aggregation-distribution-portability.html#comment-1611445</link><description>I Don't think any one is worried about getting all at one place as it is very difficult. People will concentrate more on how many followers they have, May be it is on facebook friend list or twitter follower or blog subscriber. It is all going to be reputation management and networking. It is going to be more of whom you know and how well you know them. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Each service is so distinctive, some poeple may not have a blog and still very popular with Facebook/Twitter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Siva</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:17:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>